Difference between revisions of "Generic elliptic solver"
Bentivegna (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Notes==== | ====Notes==== | ||
| + | Requirements: | ||
| + | * Steve: FunWave, need parallelism and mesh refinement; | ||
| + | * Ian: 6-variable, linear elliptic equation, need mesh refinement and perhaps parallelism; | ||
| + | * Eloisa: generic solver, easy to use and to experiment with more important than efficiency, no restriction on topology, mesh refinement would be good but doesn't need it for everything; | ||
| + | |||
| + | Existing tools: | ||
| + | * Scott's elliptic solver, second order with extension to fourth order coming soon; integrate with Cactus via own data conversions, but currently making it talk to Carpet. Available immediately via SVN; | ||
Revision as of 10:47, 2 November 2011
Notes
Requirements:
- Steve: FunWave, need parallelism and mesh refinement;
- Ian: 6-variable, linear elliptic equation, need mesh refinement and perhaps parallelism;
- Eloisa: generic solver, easy to use and to experiment with more important than efficiency, no restriction on topology, mesh refinement would be good but doesn't need it for everything;
Existing tools:
- Scott's elliptic solver, second order with extension to fourth order coming soon; integrate with Cactus via own data conversions, but currently making it talk to Carpet. Available immediately via SVN;
